Difference between Natural, Artificial and Phylogenetic Classification

Classification is the systematic grouping of organisms based on their similarities and differences (or shared common characters).

Artificial Classification

  • Based on random selection of unifying or shared characteristics
  • Classification system based on a few easily observable traits
  • Unrelated organisms may be placed together, related organisms may be separated
  • Advantage: Stable, easy to develop
  • Disadvantage: does not show evolutionary relationships, very rigid without flexibility.
  • Examples: Theophrastus (370-285 B.C.) classification of plants into herbs, shrubs and trees
  • Linnaeus (1707-1778): Classified flowering plants based on number and arrangement of stamens
  • Aristotle Classified animals into “with blood “and without blood”

Natural Classification

  • Classification based on several similarities between organisms, and evolutionary relationships
  • Several morphological characters, anatomy, cytology, biochemistry, genetics, ontogeny are considered for classification
  • Related organisms placed together; unrelated organisms separated
  • Adanson (1727-1806), A.P. de Candolle (1778-1841), Bentham (1800-1884) and Hooker (1817-1911)
  • Advantage: Classifies organisms based on similarities, widely accepted classification system because
  • Disadvantage: Shows evolutionary relationship to some extent. Rapid mutation of parameters can cause contradictory classifications; sometime closely related groups may be placed separately
  • Example: Adanson (1727-1806), A.P. de Candolle (1778-1841) classification of plants,
  • Bentham (1800-1884) and Hooker (1817-1911) system: Classified over 97,205 plant species into 202 families and 7,569 genera primarily based on morphological, anatomical and floral characters.

Phylogenetic Classification

  • Based on Evolutionary ancestry and genetic relationships
  • A classification primarily based on molecular data especially DNA sequences from multiple genes
  • Organisms are classified based on evolutionary ancestry
  • Advantage: This molecular data allows for a more reliable classification that reflects evolutionary lineage and common ancestry. Depicts genetic relationships, a modern system of classification
  • Disadvantage: Difficult to classify based on evolutionary tendencies due to imperfect fossil records and DNA sequencing possible only in sophisticated laboratories therefore not widely accepted as natural system of classification.
  • Examples: Engler (1844-1930) and Prantl (1849-1893), Bessey (1845-1915), Hutchinson (1884-1972), Takhtajan (1910-2009), Cronquist (1919-1992)
  • Angiosperm phylogeny Group (APG IV) Groups angiosperms into 64 major clades, a classification that reflects evolutionary lineage and common ancestry.

Post a Comment

We Love to hear from U :) Leave us a Comment to improve this site
Thanks for Visiting.....

Previous Post Next Post