There are two views regarding the mode of action of enzymes specifically enzyme specificity: Lock and Key hypothesis (theory)
Induced fit hypothesis (theory).
Comparison of Lock and Key hypothesis and Induced fit hypothesis
Lock and Key Theory: Emil Fisher proposed this hypothesis in 1894. According to this hypothesis the active site of the enzyme is like a ‘lock’ into which substrate fits like a ‘key’.i.e., the shape of the active site and the substrate molecules are complementary . So the enzyme molecule holds the substrate, molecule close together, forming the unusable intermediate compound, the enzyme substrate complex. It dissociates to form enzyme and products.
lock and key
Induced Fit Theory: also called as "a hand in a glove model" Daniel E.Koshland formulated this hypothesis in 1958. According to this hypothesis the active site does not have a rigid ‘lock and key’ conformation. The binding of the substrate molecule to the enzyme molecule induces to modify the shape of the active site so that it becomes complementary to the substrate molecule. This is called the induced fit . Induced fit is possible because of the flexibility of the protein molecules.


Lock and Key Theory vs Induced fit Theory
Lock and Key Theory:
1. Active site is a single entity.
2. There is no separate regulatory site like allosteric site.
3. Active site is rigid and static.
4. Development of transition state is not considered.
5.It does not visualize the weakening of substrate bonds.
6. It does not explain the mechanism of non activity in case of competitive inhibitor, allosteric regulation, and some enzymes ability to bind to several substrate with different affinity.
Induced fit Theory:
1. Active site is made of flexible entities
2. A separate catalytic group is visualized.
3. Active site is flexible.
4. It considers the development of transition state before the reactants undergo change. Both active site and substrate undergo changes to make optimal fit.
5. Catalytic group is believed to weaken the substrate bonds by nucleophilic and electrophilic attack.
6. It explains the a mechanism for non action over competitive inhibition and also allosteric regulation

11 Comments

We Love to hear from U :) Leave us a Comment to improve this site
Thanks for Visiting.....

  1. This page was of great help and i would suggest it to other colleague's!

    ReplyDelete
  2. its easier to understand when explained this way thanks

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have learnt something, thanks a lot and wish me success coz i am a form six candidate this year.

    ReplyDelete
  4. thank you so much

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do not understand what does that mean mechanism of nonaction over inhibitors

    ReplyDelete
  6. GREAT TWANG GOD BLESS GHS

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tq helped a lot

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

We Love to hear from U :) Leave us a Comment to improve this site
Thanks for Visiting.....

Previous Post Next Post